|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
In North America, we have a severe shortage of usable donor kidneys, and it is a fact that it is illegal for a donor to sell a kidney (his/her own or someone else's). You can donate one free of charge, but there’s a federal law against saying, “I’m willing to sell a kidney; let the bidding begin.”
Actually the only country in the world where you can legally sell a kidney is Iran. Therefore, the only country in the world where there’s no waiting list for donor kidneys is Iran. So the question is; why is it that Iran is the only place in the world where self-ownership is taken to its logical conclusion when it comes to one’s own organs? Do we not own our bodies? Should we not have a say in if we want to sell our body parts. And why all the pressure to donate organs when we are dead? Removal of our kidneys, lungs, liver, etc does not even serve to procure us a decent burial plot for our altruistic troubles. Everyone else involved in the legal organ donation business gets paid, except for the donor or the donor's estate. Let's face it, from the start everyone involved in the process is getting compensated. From the person who picks up the receiver when alerted to the donor organs, the surgeons who performs the transplant, the nurses who assist, certainly the recipient, and even the individuals who mop the floor in the O.R. afterwards. Everyone is compensated, except for the person actually providing the organ(s). More than 5,000 people die every year in the USA alone, while on the waiting list for a kidney, and those folks are written off as "unfortunates" in the process. If we would only let the market determine the supply, the waiting list could be eliminated virtually overnight, and everyone involved would be properly compensated in the end. The concern about poor and disenfranchised persons being forced to get on the operating table is a mute point. Measures could be put in place to prevent these sort of abuses. Everything from psychological testing, to a complete screen of the donors health and organ(s), to ensuring a direct deposit into the donor's bank account, signed documentation, video taped witness statements, and signed waivers protecting the donor from lawsuits for organ rejection. So the question is do we own our body parts or not? If not who does? And why shouldn't we be able to sell what we give away for free?
__________________
Awaken to Consciousness Last edited by jag416 : 03-24-2008 at 12:16 PM. Reason: needed revising |
|
|||
|
Quote:
I am concerned, however, that legally selling tissue/organs would lead to terrible abuses of both sellers and recipients. From my perspective, the only ones that would benefit from such a system would be the companies buying and selling the tissue/organs. As an official requestor for tissue donation at my hospital, I have seen that some patients/family members are able to bring something good out of their loss by giving 'the gift of life, the gift of another chance' to a stranger. I have also witnessed the utterly reprehensible behaviors of a certain for-profit company which preys upon the grief of patients/family members and which, when all is said and done, leaves the family without support and with a big bill. Given these two current options, a not-for-profit agency and a for-profit agency, it is clear to me that altruism is a far, far better choice. Good thread. Joy |
|
||||
|
I too share your concerns about people being generally able to sell a kidney. I am not sure what might be worse, individuals haqwking their organs on some kind of ebay like website, or large companies making money out of the misfortune of others. You only have one kidney when it comes to giving it away / selling it and there are some really unscrupulous individuals out there.
|
|
||||
|
Somehow selling my body parts to the highest bidder seems wrong on a visceral level.... but that's just me.
__________________
www.MyOwnWoman.blogspot.com |
|
||||
|
Whoa, this is a heavy one.
I think it's called organ "donation" for a reason. By making it a "no strings attached" offer of an organ, many of the potential unscrupulous factors are automatically removed. Now, if I am willing, as a living person, to donate to a family member or other person with whom I am matched, it would be appropriate to have the hospital costs covered, along with the time off of work compensated. Once you start getting into compensating people for the actual organ or for the "pain and suffering" involved, you get into legal/ethical issues. The same goes with a donor on life support, except for the work compensation part.
__________________
The ER is the only place where you are rewarded for efficiency by getting more patients! Kim ![]() ![]() ![]() http://www.emergiblog.com |
|
|||
|
With all the urban legends about "waking up in a bathtub missing a kidney" out there, if selling a kidney was legal...
The issue with selling anything is that it will bring out the even less-scrupulous people to attempt to make money. Imagine the difficulties if people with blood-borne diseases managed to donate organs through unscrupulous people; the list goes on... |
|
||||
|
Quote:
With organ donation, many people with to donate, but it is the family which has the final say and generally it is no. There was a concept going round that there could be compulsory donation unless you had registered not to before YOUR death (family has not say in it). Many situations with family arise because they don't want their loved one 'cut up'. Until recently a lot of people didn't understand that the body goes in as if for a normal surgery. Family can also decided what organs can be donated, heart, kidneys, lungs, skin. But 'Heaven knows we need them on Earth"
__________________
'Think not of yourself as the architect of your career but as the sculptor. Expect to have to do a lot of hard hammering and chiselingand scraping and polishing. - BC Forbes' |
|
||||
|
I always thought there was an age limit for someone donating anything. Last fall one of my 89 yr old hospice patients was able to donate skin. Her family was told that it could help over 20 cancer or burn patients. I personally think that if the patient signed an organ donor card, the family should have no say. As for selling organs- I have a problem with making a profit on giving.
Bev ![]() |
|
||||
|
***NEWS***
This week the Australian Government suggested introducing an opt-out organ donor scheme. This means that everyone is a potential organ donor unless they opt out before their death.
__________________
'Think not of yourself as the architect of your career but as the sculptor. Expect to have to do a lot of hard hammering and chiselingand scraping and polishing. - BC Forbes' |
|
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|